Archive | Horror

The Cook

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 01 August 2008 by Stacy Neuberger

Starring Mark Hengst, Kit Paquin and Makinna Ridgeway, this movie is an hour and twenty-two minutes long.  It is rated R for language, violence and sexuality involving nudity.

This movie is set in a sorority that is in desperate need for a cook.  It finds a temporary cook, a nice looking man from Hungry, and yes several jokes are made about the Hungry Cook.  The sorority sisters are sexually charged and most of them seem to lean towards a lesbian way of life, although a few of them are switch hitters.  They are pretty much all slutty girls, with two exceptions, the smart girl who has sex with no one and the religious virginal girl who doesn’t eat meat and gets tempted by a life of spankings.  The cook however has a surprise, and the girls never know, even though some of their sisters dissappear and their meat packed dishes are so good yet the meat is much a mystery.

This movie could have been fun, and there were times when I laughed.  There was one scene especially that set two scenes together, one from a Friday the 13th movie and one from this, referring them together.  It was fun and funny because while watching it I wasn’t sure what would happen, if the girl would get away or not.  The scenes were pretty much lacking in dialogue or acting and relied mostly on the nudity of the girls involved.  Which is fine if that is the kind of movie you want, but unfortunate if you want a “different” horror film.  This movie wasn’t much of a horror or a suspensful film.

Predictibly many of the girls died, and the ending was so obvious that I almost didn’t watch it.  However I did, just to see if I was right about it, and surprise, I was.  I was dissappointed because this could have been an interesting movie, in the lines of Rest Stop or Wolf Creek.  Instead the movie relied more on nudity than story.

I don’t reccommend that anyone see this movie, unless you want a porn, because basically that is what this is.  A bad porn because there isn’t any actual pictures of sex, just “sexual” scenes.  This movie isn’t good, but it isn’t horrible.  If you are looking for a scary movie don’t see this one.


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (3)

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (12 votes, score: 4.17 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 20 July 2008 by JCook83

Hold on to your carotids! You’re in for a bloody, messy ride. Director Tim Burton takes the audience on a chaotic journey through revenge, death, cannibalism, and sorrow in this maniacal, gory musical.

Once upon a time (pardon the cliché), London was home to a humble yet talented barber, Benjamin Barker (Johnny Depp), his wife Lucy, and daughter Johanna (Jayne Wisener). All was well until the corrupt Judge Turpin (Alan Rickman) decides that he wants Lucy for himself. To get her away from Benjamin, Turpin slaps some bogus charges on the town barber and sends him to prison in Australia. Judge Turpin then has his way with Lucy, completely destroying her life and spirit, and locks up Johanna in his house, forcing her to grow up there. After 15 years, Barker returns to London and assumes the alias Sweeney Todd. He wanders in to Mrs. Lovett’s pie shop, home of his ex-landlord. Mrs. Lovett (Helena Bonham Carter) reveals that Lucy went mad and suicidal and then gives Todd his barber shop back. Dreaming of revenge on Judge Turpin, Sweeny challenges and defeats a rival barber, Pirelli (Sasha Baron Cohen), in a barbers’ duel to show off his skill and attract customers, especially the judge. Pirelli recognizes Todd and attempts to confront him in at his shop. Todd slashes his throat, hides the body, and sends Pirelli’s young assistant (Timothy Spall) to work with Mrs. Lovett in the pie shop. This begins a very long line of serial killings of just about anyone who dares take a seat in Sweeny’s chair. Together, Mrs. Lovett, who falls deeply in love with Todd, and Sweeny decide that the best and most profitable way to dispose of bodies is to grind them up and serve them in Mrs. Lovett’s pies.  In a reckless attempt to get his revenge and be reunited with his daughter, Sweeney finds out that Mrs. Lovett, whose judgment was blinded by love, may not have been completely truthful with him and discovers that he may have ended up carving one too many throats.

The one thing I just could not get over was all of the blood and gore in this movie. I know…I know….you have to have some blood if you are going to slit someone’s throat, but this was major overkill. Todd’s barber shop comes nicely equipped with a chair that dumps the bodies of the deceased downstairs where they can be discretely ground up into decadent pies. The chair tends to dump the bodies backwards so they land on their heads and their brains come spilling out with a lovely, sickening thud. If the blood and gore could have been cut into about half, I may have been able to pay more attention to the storyline and the acting instead of staring blankly at the spraying blood and mashed body organs. The film would be so much more effective if you weren’t distracted by nausea and vomiting.

I knew that this movie was a musical from the beginning. I expected the singing, dancing, and silliness that come along with a musical, but again, overkill. I’m not sure that there was 20 minutes total of just dialog in the whole movie. At the end, I was so tired of hearing people sing that I could scream. I even considered turning off the film about halfway through because I was so annoyed by it. You can make a successful musical without singing the ENTIRE way through it (i.e. Chicago). Like the blood and gore, if the singing were cut in half, the movie would have been ten times better.

This movie was not one of my favorites. The dark, elaborate costumes and settings were my favorite things in the film, but they too were overshadowed by the forced special effects and music. On a positive note, yes ladies, Johnny Depp can still look hot as a psycho serial killer inflicting exsanguination upon his unsuspecting victims.


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (2)

Teeth

Reviewer's Rating: This entry has a rating of 3
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (6 votes, score: 3.17 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 20 July 2008 by nwertanen99

Written and Directed by Michael Lichtenstein, this independent horror-thriller has the unique premise of a willfully strong teen girl discovering something is very genetically different from her and other girls when she becomes sexually active, much to the dismay of several young men trying to take advantage of her.

Young, blonde, sweet and innocent teen Dawn (Jess Weixler) grows up in an idealic suburban neighborhood with her sick mother, step-father and step-brother (John Hensley). She volunteers her time preaching abstinence to young kids and other teens, and is a leader of a chastity movement of sorts, even wearing a promise ring stating to herself, and others, that she will wait until her knight in shining armor comes along and proposes before giving up her “special gift.” That is until she meets Tobey (Hale Appleman), a seemingly nice young boy who is also supposedly saving himself for marriage. When the two young teens begin a romance, there hormones spin out of control. Dawn tries to stop anything from happening, but Tobey forces himself on her and to horrifying consequences. Dawn is also horrified to learn the truth of what happens. That she has Vagina-Dentala, simply put: her vagina has a defense mechanism…teeth, and it defends itself violently against all phalic shaped invaders. As Dawn begins to get more curious about her body, she also investigates the real-life myths surrounding the phenomenon.

From it’s opening “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” twist in the family pool, to the over-the-top chastity message, to the squimish, make any guy in the audience feel violently ill gore via castrations, Teeth is a true first in the horror field. It intelligently flips the usual formula in the genre right on its head. Typically the young, attractive female is cornered into any number of situations that require her to be exploited, humiliated, raped or killed. In this film, the female turns the tables on the unsuspecting men, and also feeds not only on the real-life myths on the subject, but also the basic male fears of castration. Never before has a movie so gleefully dismembered males in such a gorey and violent manner. The film can definetly seem anti-male, as nearly every male in the movie, especially the seemingly nice ones, are all painted as violent, sex craved maniacs devoid of sympathy or emotion. Between Dawn’s step-brother obsessing over her, “nice guys” taking advantage of her, raping her, drugging and fondling her, and doctors full fisting her on the exam station, its no wonder her vagina defends itself.

Aside from the gore, which is insanely in-your-face and gruesome, the movie does have its flaws. The idealic suburban locales and the 1950’s style chastity clubs are a little unbelievable and hard to connect with in a modern horror movie. I did like that the movie opens with the panoramic view of the perfect little neighborhood with the huge  nuclear power plant behind, which led to me to immediately think that radiation would play apart in Dawn’s condition, but the plant was apparently there for no reason what-so-ever, which was disappointing, as it is featured in several shots in the film. Also, the film does meander along at a very slow pace for the first 40 minutes or so before the first shocking castration. Following that, Dawn’s story goes in wierd directions and never quite seemed to capitalize on what it had going for it. Dawn spends the final two acts of the film wandering around and investigating her condition as random things occur around her. The whole hospital plot with the sick mom was very confusing in the final act, and the inevitable “confrontation” with her step-brother is way too choreographed.

However, Jess Weixler does a respectable job in the lead role of Dawn, and her “gee-whiz” pure and innocent schoolgirl attitude does help to add to the irony of everything going on. Her journey is a simple, and predictable one, but an enjoyable one to watch. The rest of the cast floats in and out of the movie mostly, with exception of the step-brother role, who is played with no redemptive qualities at all by Hensley. As a horror movie, it was worth the viewing, but not one that needs to be re-watched and not one worth owning by any means. While the gore was top-notch, the obvious message of the movie is ultimately blown with such a ridiculous premise as vagina with teeth, but I doubt that Lichtenstein was honestly trying to preach to younger viewers. Its ironic that most of the viewers of this movie will be younger males, hoping for female nudity from Weixler. If thats the case, they won’t be completley disappointed, but the nudity ratio overwhelmingly swings towards the males, by about a 5 to 1 margain. Sorry boys. Like everything else, this movie is not your typical horror film exploiting females and flashing T&A in every third scene, its the exact opposite actually.

Overall, a well-done and original horror film that in ways satires horror films. Worth checking out, but its definetly no classic or anything.


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Dead and Gone

Reviewer's Rating: This entry has a rating of 4.5
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (1 votes, score: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 16 July 2008 by Derek Fleek

Discovering a worthwhile horror comedy that is released directly to DVD is a gleeful moment for buffs of the genre like myself, and I think I discovered one of the scariest direct-to-DVD horror comedies released in years. The terrifying film Dead and Gone is available on DVD July 1.

Poor Jack Wade. His famous wife is in a coma and they are steadily running low on money. But Jack has an idea — he’ll bring his wife out to an isolated cabin deep in the mountains where he can finally put her body to rest for good and gain the assets he so desperately needs. However, this is the same cabin where a man murdered his family 40 years ago and it is rumored to be built on an Indian burial ground. Now, killing his wife isn’t as easy as he thought it would be.

Harry Shannon’s inaugural screenplay is put into the hands of first-time director Yossi Sasson. The producers and screenwriter evidently trusted this rookie director to bring Shannon’s insane ideas to life. I think it was this trust that elevated this picture and it’s clear that Sasson knew where to go with this concept and how to execute it.

Don’t rent this film expecting full-on horror. Although it does have quite a bit of blood-spewing action, it has its moments of dark humor wedged in. But this is humor so dry you probably will find yourself thinking it’s funny rather than laughing out loud. It gels horror with deadpan comedy very well by not making us burst into laughter. It mostly benefits from flashy imagery and fast motion sequences that polish the look, tighten the atmosphere, and ultimately scare the hell out of the viewers.

Quentin Jones proved his ability to carry a movie, bearing in mind that he was pretty much the highlight of the film. There are a few well done cameo appearances by Kyle Gass from the two-man band Tenacious D and horror regular Zack Ward who first made his appearance as a child actor in the film A Christmas Story as Scut Farcus. These cameo appearances aren’t anything special, but might satisfy the few fans they have. It’s a gooey surprise and a solid debut for both Harry Shannon and Yossi Sasson.

In the vein of The Shining and The Evil Dead, this white knuckle thrill-ride will have you on the edge of your seat from its gripping opening scene to its twisted finale. Hell, you just might fall off your seat. The last 25 minutes of the film are truly frightening and there are enough harrowing twists and turns to maintain the intrigue. It even has a tingling score with a light chuckle tweaked in occasionally. Not only does it have the ability to send chills up the spine, but it will also have you biting your nails down to the core.

Look for it when it hits the rental shelves on July 1 and you can thank me later. DVD special features include the featurette “Gone with the Dead: Behind the Scenes of Dead and Gone“, filmmakers’ commentary with director Yossi Sasson and writer Harry Shannon, deleted scenes, outtakes, and a trailer gallery. 4.5/5 stars


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Massacre at Central High

Reviewer's Rating: This entry has a rating of 1.5
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (1 votes, score: 2 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 16 July 2008 by Derek Fleek

Welcome to Central High, where everyone is treated with equal disrespect. Bullies roam the school’s premises in search of timid bystanders and beautiful women to molest. Fortunately we have our hero to save the day, or destroy it with his madman personality. A new kid who becomes agitated over the violence that these bullies inflict on innocent people decides to resort to violence himself to teach them a lesson.

Massacre at Central High
sports a cast of unknown actors and actresses who willingly display full frontal nudity and end up getting killed in the process. Writer/director Rene Daalder’s first full length American feature isn’t a complete disaster, for it clearly has a classic feel to it. The constant use of frat boy violence, the transformation of a seemingly normal guy to one who exhibits outbursts of rage, and nearly farcical kills yield a mixture of a violent satire of Animal House, The Incredible Hulk (without the green), and classic slap-happy slasher flicks. It just doesn’t quite work and shouldn’t work with the ingredients provided.

The score here has to be the most ill-suited aspect of the entire film. It just seems that the usage of a violin could have given off a creepy vibe instead of a happy-go-lucky one. Those of you who are looking for a so-called classic with a no-budget effect similar to this one should go rent a film like Sleepaway Camp. The attempts at piling up corpses here are laughable and contrived, due to lack of effort. I do have a keen desire to like films with bad titles and the occasional unintentional laughter, but there is a line to be drawn and this movie crosses it one too many times.

The ending is a huge let-down and the whole experience was just strange and never quite engaging. Everything (the kills, the characters, the direction, etc.) plays out by the numbers and no new ideas are thrown into the mix, leading to a cliched execution.

If you can get past the helpless beginning, unfit score, and wretched line reading, you might be able to find a splash of guilty pleasure here and there. Just don’t count on it. The film never pushes its otherwise respectable concept to its limits and ends up being a film that (just by reading the title) gives you insight on what you’re in for. It’s an instantly forgettable and comically bad film that might possibly have a following considering the interest in revenge films, but I just don’t see it being big enough to develop a fan base. 1.5/5 stars


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Mutant Chronicles

Reviewer's Rating: This entry has a rating of 4.5
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (1 votes, score: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 13 July 2008 by Derek Fleek

I managed to get a exclusive look at the upcoming film The Mutant Chronicles, blasting its way into theaters some time in 2008. The exact release date is unknown as of this writing, but it’s certain that it will be some time this year. The big question is whether or not it is worth the time and price of admission.

During the 23rd century, a soldier by the name of Mitch Hunter (Thomas Jane) guides an army of fierce fighters to battle underground mutants after opening a seal to an ancient creation. This creation is a machine known to turn humans into blade-slinging mutants determined to wipe out mankind. It is up to Mitch and his fierce army to save the world. Quite possibly the first ever pen-and-paper-role-playing-game-turned-movie, The Mutant Chronicles is surprisingly satisfying.

Loud, exciting, very funny, and brutally entertaining, it just might be the action film of the year — a movie full of great fight scenes, excitement around every corner, and visually arresting set designs that will hold even the most cynical viewer’s interest. Truthfully, it is the most fun I’ve had at the movies in a long time.

Sporting an A-list action cast that includes Ron Perlman (Hellboy) and Thomas Jane (The Punisher), it is sure to please a certain targeted audience that has a lust for action and a strong appetite for gore. The thrills, the shocks, and the sheer enjoyment of going to the movies is all there and in full, ass-kicking form.

But don’t get me wrong, readers, this isn’t a masterpiece. It does have its glitches like underdeveloped characters, loads of commentary, and Ron Perlman’s acting (which is nearly laughable). Not to mention the small cameo appearance from John Malkovich was unnecessary and could’ve saved the filmmakers a few bucks by casting an unknown actor for this role. Things like that are giving the movie a bad rep after its premier at the Cannes Film Festival. However, there are enough adrenaline-charged moments to flush out these glitches and make for pure entertainment.

In the final act, we get to see Hellboy and The  Punisher go head-to-head in a battle to the death. It’s an exhilarating moment added to the tons of violence beforehand and a great finish to a spectacular fusion of sci-fi, action, horror, and comedy. The Mutant Chronicles is an authentic film and certainly worth the admission price, popcorn and all. 4.5/5 stars


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

CAPTIVITY (18)

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (1 votes, score: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 06 July 2008 by lisamarie

Director: Roland Joffè
Starring: Elisha Cuthbert

The Premise: This new offering from the Torture Porn genre is about a lonely Top Model who is drugged, kidnapped, and forced to endure her worst fears.

The Good: Joffè does a good job of creating tension and suspense. He gives a grainy, low-budget feel to the action that serves to build up the fear in both the viewer and the victim, Jennifer (Cuthbert). Sadly, that’s the only praise this appalling film deserves.

The Bad: Where’s the plot? No, seriously, where is it? Do the killers have a motive other than pure desire for the kill? It’s never really explained. The random, out-of-place flashback to the killers’ childhood does little more than add an extra layer of twisted evil to the story. It serves no purpose. And for a Torture Porn film, there’s surprisingly little torture endured by the victim. The killers are playing a game—that much is established—but there’s no explanation. There’s not much of anything, to be honest. The victim seems to spend more time sleeping than she does being scared. You spend the entire ninety minutes waiting for something truly horrific to happen—as you would expect from a film in this genre—and then come away angry that you’ll never get that time back.

Overall Verdict: Considering Joffè was once Oscar-worthy, this is a very poor offering indeed. If you like Torture Porn, re-watch the Saw franchise. Don’t waste your time on this.


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (1)

Pathology (2008)

Reviewer's Rating: This entry has a rating of 4.5
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (7 votes, score: 4.43 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 30 June 2008 by asmoul89

Pathology Movie PosterDirected by: Marc Schoelermann.

Starring: Milo Ventimiglia as Ted Grey, Michael Weston as Jake Gallo, Alyssa Milano as Gwen Williamson, and Lauren Lee Smith as Juliette Bath.

Is there a doctor in the house? Okay, so Pathology deals with the other kind of doctor–the medical examiner. Pathology takes place in the ever dreaded morgue of a popular hospital. With gore abound and almost flawless execution, Marc Schoelermann creates a film to die for.

Ted Grey is an anatomy prodigy with wit that goes virtually unmatched. He joins a group of medical school students in residency and is quickly cast as an outsider due to his immense knowledge of gross human anatomy. He then meets the egotistical head honcho of the group Jake Gallo. After going on a drunken tour de slums (with Jake) in which Ted meets an immoral body guard and an even more immoral prostitute grandmother, Ted is shocked to discover the body of body guard in the morgue the next day. Of course, in his drunken stupor Ted wound up blacking out and can’t remember anything, but he does suspect Jake had something to do with the ghastly murder. This is where the game begins. Jake asks Ted to meet him back at the hospital later that evening. After meeting in front of the elevators, Jake takes Ted down to a sequestered wing of the hospital. In the abandoned surgical room lies the corpse of the body guard with a few fellow members of the residency team. Jake explains to Ted the object of the game is to commit the perfect murder. From then on, Dr. Ted Grey is sucked into a deadly game of wits, skill, and sexual temptation. The consequences of his actions are dramatic and heartbreaking. Ted Grey pays the ultimate price…but so does Jake Gallo.

Pathology isn’t your typical brain dead gore horror flick. This film’s dialogue is uniquely intelligent, thoughtful, and downright cunning. Take this snippet of a quote from Professor Dr. Morris as an example:  “You will see the perversion, the corruption of the flesh by all means unnatural. And then we will work backwards, always back to that original pristine design, to determine the affecting cause of death.” The aforementioned quote is completely ironic given the plot of the film. Aside from its irony, the quote (there are many more like them) serves as a prime example for the intellectual dialogue one will discover while watching this film.

What I find to be extremely brilliant is how the film preys upon a common human weakness. When we hear of a registered sex offender molesting and murdering a child or a drug dealer selling dope while his/her kid watches helplessly from a nearby car, it is in our human nature to desire vigilante justice. We actually want to see these types of atrocities avenged! If the law were not holding us back, think of how many people would play judge and jury. Pathology may seem like a zany and nonsensical film, but it leaves the lingering questions for your subconscious to solve. This is what makes Pathology so psychologically terrifying!

Pathology possesses the twisted games and gore from the Saw series and the secluded secret group up to no good from films such as Fight Club. This film is nothing short of a stomach-churning psychological rollercoaster ride. Once you slip the DVD into your player and begin watching, I guarantee you will be entertained throughout. Come on, give Pathology a chance…it will leave you scared stiff.

***4.5 out of 5 stars***


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Teeth: Does This Film Bite?

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (3 votes, score: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 30 June 2008 by Wes Laurie

Teeth: if you pay attention to horror news at all you know it is the “movie where the girl’s vagina has teeth.” I’ll tell you my thoughts after having watched it and whether or not it lives up to its campy premise and festival circuit buzz, being out on DVD.

Teeth was directed by Mitchell Lichtenstein and the female lead was done by Jess Weixler. The plot, as plucked from IMDB: “High school student Dawn works hard at suppressing her budding sexuality by being the local chastity group’s most active participant. Her task is made even more difficult by her bad boy stepbrother Brad’s increasingly provocative behavior at home. A stranger to her own body, innocent Dawn discovers she has a toothed vagina when she becomes the object of violence. As she struggles to comprehend her anatomical uniqueness, Dawn experiences both the pitfalls and the power of being a living example of the vagina dentata myth.”

At first the movie almost feels like someone attempting to tap into the same quirky vibe present in a Tim Burton movie. It’s hard to explain why, since there weren’t elaborate fantasy sets or Johnny Depp with a funky hair-do, but it just felt that way. Yet, at the same time the director, who also wrote the film, put his own stamp on it. There is a reason Tim Burton’s stamp is way more valuable though; another thing that cannot be explained and is best felt; ha. The set-up in Teeth is a long one punch joke, meaning everything in the characters lives seems to be about repressed sexual urges, literally every conversation, situation, or shot has something to do with sex; even the holes in trees are lingered on for too long to seem like bodily orifice replicas. The joke is good for a bit, but wears thin really quick.

So, you get moved on from the humor and set up and get into the crucial turning point of things: the rape scene. The problem with the first violent attack of vagina teeth is the fact that 99% of people going to see this movie already know this is going to happen. Thus, all the power of the scene is truly lost and when you should be getting pulled out of the boring stupor that the set-up dropped you into you are instead just yawning some more. Eventually I wanted to fast forward.

The gore in this movie is quite explicit, if you’ve ever wanted shots of  severed penises and penis stumps spurting blood: you’ll be pleased. However, the horror movie devices used in this film along with the campy way it is executed steals away from the meat of things which is the coming of age story involving the girl. Yes, this was a very creative way to tell such a tale, but overall it ends up as just a gimmick style film, or as a I stated a long joke with a redundantly used punch line.

On the acting front of things Jess Weixler is quite interesting with a wide range of facial gestures that make her fun to watch. She does look quite a bit like Heather Graham, but fresher. The actor who played her demented brother in the film was equally interesting to see: John Hensley.

Final thoughts: You’re probably going to want to see this just to be able to say you saw the vagina with teeth movie. (no you do not get any shots of the vagina) Aside from some interesting actors and a few campy jokes, this movie gets boring by the halfway mark and even though there is a wonderfully creepy old man in the ending, you may find yourself fast forwarding through the rest of the penis decapitations to get there.


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (1)

Movie Review: Untraceable

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (1 votes, score: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 30 June 2008 by Wes Laurie

Untraceable was directed by Gregory Hoblit, who also directed the thriller Fracture. The movie follows an FBI cyber crime unit as they try to stop a new breed of killer. Someone is killing people live on the internet, devising the murders in a way that the more website visits he gets the quicker the victim dies; essentially making curious internet surfers accomplices to murder. The movie stars Diane Lane, Billy Burke, and Colin Hanks.

To start out with: the movie has lots of bad dialog, the actors cannot be to blame for the stale way in which they deliver such lines. However, I was able to push past such things and “go with the flow.” In this way I was able to indeed find entertainment value. The director sets a solid moody tone with darkness and visual shots which were the main thing that kept me into the film regardless of my initially not being impressed with the dialog. The tension and action is built up quite well.

The premise is an intriguing one, which many automatically want to chalk up to as being a gimmick to become preachy on the way society acts towards violence in the new age of internet media and how people will watch snuff films such as beheadings and or suicides  without thinking how this affects the families of the victims. People would visit the killer’s website to see someone die, whether or not they knew he was a good guy with a family. I thought the obvious morality message was not preached too heavily and was handled fairly well.

People who cannot help but pick apart logic flaws, especially computer savvy or chemical savvy folks, will probably not get as much enjoyment out of this movie. Why did the battery acid melt through skin and bone, but not the plastic ties binding his arms? There are lots of liberties taken and unrealistic scenarios. However, if you hop into this ride just looking for some entertainment: it is a worthy rental. The only thing I will caution viewers about though is the gore factor. The deaths in this movie are fairly brutal and gory ala skin getting melted off and such.


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Paint Shaker

Reviewer's Rating: This entry has a rating of 3.5
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 30 June 2008 by Wes Laurie

Director Patrick Rea of SenoReality Pictures sent me a copy of one of his latest short films: PAINT SHAKER. The story was written by Jon Niccum.

SenoReality is based out of Kansas, so naturally The Wizard of Oz has a special place in their movie-loving hearts. Or at least as displayed in Paint Shaker has a place in their philosophical ponderings and curiosity. The film is introduced by bringing to one’s attention the moment within the Wizard of Oz when Dorothy and pals are getting ready to go get the Wicked Witch and the Scarecrow of all things is seen holding a gun. Most people have probably overlooked this aspect of detail without pondering: where did he get a gun? Google it, you’ll find all sorts of explanations and theory.

Paint Shaker, though approached with some artsy meaning that can be open to the viewers interpretation, (for example: one person I viewed it with was completely baffled as to what the point was or what it could have meant, whereas another one was given too much that he could elaborate upon endlessly) the basic premise of the film revolves around three employees at a hardware store, their boss, and then an employee that was fired, returning with a shotgun.

The picture quality of Paint Shaker is high class, though there is a lot of blurring effect used, ala things in the background are a blur when your attention is to be on the actors at the forefront. Not being a filmmaker myself I cannot say whether this was an artistic choice being toyed with or if it was making due with the budget and equipment. All I can say is that it did not bother me and looked good for an Indie production.

The violence of the movie is counter balanced with funny little bits that are every day life cute and identifiable. One character is looking to get Saturday off, whereas another refuses to cover for him because he is planning to spend quality time with a video game, and when the disgruntled guy with the gun comes into the store one character is more fascinated than scared as the shooting begins.

It all ends with a serious murder suicide situation turning out at least one positive benefit for one character and some things for him to briefly ponder about life. However, the depth can overall be seen as a touch of reality, these are the random thoughts that go through our minds, these are the horrible events that take place everyday, and this is the quirky humor with which we take it all in stride.

This is a short to be checked out if you find a place to do so, currently if you want to check out other works by Patrick Rea stop in at their webpage www.senoreality.com or they are on YOUTUBE


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Otis

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 30 June 2008 by Wes Laurie

The plot for Otis involves a man who kidnaps young girls and forces them to act out his high school fantasy of taking them to the prom and getting lucky afterwards. He doesn’t seem to have much luck and has gone through and had to kill five girls, but his latest seems promising. Until she escapes and her family decides to cut the authorities out of the loop when it comes to justice and how they would like it served.

The movie is a comedy, a satire if you will, of the torture horror genre, along with the all too common psychopaths and their actions in reality. The important thing for this horror movie then isn’t being scary, but rather: is it funny? Indeed it is, many chuckles to be had throughout.

The cast features some notable names such as Daniel Stern, Illeana Douglas, and Kevin Pollack. However, it is the title character that really steals the show: Otis as played by Bostin Christopher. Yes, he is sick and demented, yet at the same time there are sequences where you actually feel almost sorry for him, one specifically involves dancing under a disco ball while his captive tries to remain terrified and not grin. This acting leads a hint of reality based identifiably to the story and characters and is then counterbalanced with completely absurd characters such as the FBI agent with an 8% recovery rate. The absurd is mixed just right though and brings the joke full circle.

The only issue I had was with the “joke” itself. The movie plays like one joke with many facets, but ultimately the same joke: laugh at this disturbing situation. This causes some drag and instead of fast paced action I started finding my mind wandering. It never got too boring though and each set piece was enjoyable, even if some were too long. Other than that I’ve got a television that for some reason amplifies music in movies and there was a lot of music laced throughout that seemed overkill at times, yet a perfect fit others. So, what does this mean? It means nothing is perfect, but Otis was a pretty good flick!


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (1)

Shutter

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (1 votes, score: 1 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 29 June 2008 by Oscar Gutierrez

America has grown fond of remaking Japanese horror movies a mere years after their release in their own country and if there’s one thing I can say for them it’s that they’re not getting worse. Off the top of my head I’m going to start the trend with The Ring and after that became a huge success you started getting The Grudge, The Grudge 2, The Ring 2, One Missed Call, and Shutter. I’m sure I’m missing many but the ones named will serve my point. Now after The Ring which I absolutely adored, the movies shot downhill. The Grudge was horrible and after that none of the movies raised the bar. None of them ever really got worse than the last but the only reason for that is that all of them have followed the exact same formula as the last. They all must have a scary Japanese girl with long black hair, they all must have some foreboding imagery (photographs, telephone calls, VCR’s), and disturbing scenes. Shutter does not break this tradition.

The film stars Joshua Jackson and Rachel Taylor who previously had starred in Transformers and tells the story of their life as newlyweds who start being followed by a mysterious spirit that begins appearing in all of their photographs. This girl appears to be the same girl that they ran over a while after their wedding and she seems to want revenge. Now the plot is very thin, even for one of ‘these’ movies, and the acting for the most part falls flat. However, what really gets me about this movie is how completely they seem to rip off The Ring.

Now I’ve mentioned before that all of these movies follow a similar… ok an exact formula, but this just takes it to a whole other level. The actress is made to look almost exactly like Naomi Watts in the Ring but that can be passed as coincidental, what can’t be passed is this; Remember the scene in The Ring where Rachel walks up to the dead guy in the chair after Samara has killed him? His back is turned to Rachel, there’s a huge puddle of water on the floor near him, and she slowly walks up to him and reaches for his shoulder. Well it’s as if the director felt he could pull this off as well by placing everything in the exact same place in Shutter and just switching the actors. The scene was such a rip off that you could somehow consider it an homage as a defense, but not a good one.

The film has very few scares scattered throughout it’s runtime and I found myself checking my watch constantly and groaning that I had only sat through forty five minutes when it felt like two hours had passed, even for a remake this is a horrible sign. The film drags forever and moves at a glacial pace to lead up to a dull, predictable, and laughable ending. Of course we get some deaths along the way but nothing really interesting, and nothing that hasn’t been done before. I found myself bored to death the entire time and found nearly no enjoyment in watching this movie. In fact if anything it made me want to go home and watch The Ring. This movie was a complete disappointment just like all the other movies of it’s kind and I give it a resounding 1.5/5


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (2)

The Happening

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (11 votes, score: 2.27 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 27 June 2008 by nwertanen99

“Plastic. I’m talking to a plastic tree.”

Oh boy.

The sixth film by writer/director M. Night Shyamalan is undeniably different than his previous five films. For starters, it is the first film that has recieved a ‘R’ rating, and it’s also (surprisingly) a film without any attempt for his trademark twist ending. There’s no attempt to fool you or to pull something from behind an invisible curtain. In his previous films, Shyamalan had a gift for setting things up and layering the events of the movie in such a way that we were surprised by the ending. Everything was important and so every scene was crucial. That is not the case in his latest paranoid thriller, The Happening, which explains the great mystery of what’s going on very early in the film, and the movie suffers greatly as a result.

The film focuses on a high school science teacher, Elliot Moore (Mark Wahlberg), and his estrainged wife, Alma (Zooey Deschanel) as they try to protect a young girl (Ashlyn Sanchez) while on the run from a mysterious natural threat to humanity. An event starts in Central Park where people suddenly become disoriented and lose motor functions and then finally feel compelled to kill themselves in any variety of horrible ways. Theories spread about what could be causing it, the first theory being that it’s a chemical attack by terrorists. A panic ensues and in Philadelphia, Elliot and Alma join Julian (John Leguizamo) and his daughter, Jess (Sanchez) on the first available train out of the city. Shortly later, reports come in that Boston and Philadelphia have both been hit by the same threat and then the conductor of the train loses contact with the outside world and stops the train in a small Pennsylvania town, leaving Elliot, Alma and the rest of the passengers to fend for themselves. Julian leaves Jess with Elliot and Alma as he hitches a ride to go search for his wife, and the three of them go on the run as they try to figure out whats going on and how to survive it.

The Happening is a truely bizzare film. It is very reminescent of the 1950’s apocalyptic paranoid thriller’s about the end of the world or alien invaders. Most noticably, the writing doesn’t seem as polished as in his previous films. I know I am in the minority, but I enjoyed Lady in the Water and think Shyamalan took a step backwards with this film. Litterally about 1/3 of the way into the movie you’re told what’s going on, that it has something to do with the wind and another thing I won’t divulge here. So, from that point on we’re not as scared, both because of what it is and because the mystery is gone. The movie relies on scare moments and the acting of the main characters, which is extremely wierd and hard to watch at times. Mark Wahlberg plays his role with two basic expressions, worrying and thinking about worrying and does both with the same basic intense look on his face. It’s painful to see a great actor reduced to playing an unconvincing teacher with the emotional range of a wet sack.

Perhaps the moment where I started to lose faith in the film is where Elliot and Alma are walking along in a field with other survivors and Alma confesses having gone on a date with another guy she met at work. Firstly, she does it so mousey and so mumbly that it just seems wierd and ungenuine. Then Mark Wahlberg’s reaction is basically to breathe heavily for a moment and cheesily say “You lied to me?” and then continue walking without another word. I’m sorry, but especially under the stressful situation they’re in, any guy would’ve screamed at his wife at that point, or had some reaction. They both just seem so unbelievable in the movie. Don’t get me wrong, both Wahlberg and Deschanel are amazing actors on any other day, but both played there parts in this movie very cardboard like. Maybe that’s what Shyamalan wanted, maybe it was on purpose and it was for some unknown reason that escaped me, but I didn’t like it. Deschanel’s role is attempted to be explained away as her having trouble expressing herself and her emotions to others, but that doesn’t help her performance any. She has the biggest and among the most beautiful blue eyes in hollywood, but they spend most of the movie in an prolonged hightened sense of terror, often for no reason.

Then there’s the needless attempt for a ‘R’ rated horror film, probably just to advertise the movie as Shymalan’s first. Take out a few gory scenes and the film is essentially ‘PG’. However, the horror scenes are quite graphic, sometimes needlessly so and I often found myself missing the more subtle horror in his previous ‘PG-13′ films, which to me was much more terrifying because we were allowed the ability to see what we wanted and essentially scared ourselves. Here it is just all there for us to see. Blood and gore and all. The scenes depicting humans killing themselves in all sorts of different methods are quite disturbing and horrible, as they should be, but the looming big picture threat wasn’t pulled off as well, and often came off as just silly nonsense. Also, the threat occurs so early in the film, that the main characters are essentially on the run the entire film and that gets old after awhile. There’s nothing worse than a 90 minute film with 45 minutes of worthwhile storytelling to accomplish. 

Threat and acting aside, I do like where the movie ended up, and the messages it got across. Besides the obvious one, which will be apparent when you see the movie, I quite liked another scene near the end of the movie, which was the only honest and well written scene in my opinion. Elliot and Alma are in seperate rooms talking to one another thru a pipe in the ground as the looming threat is outside. They start talking about there first date and how Elliot bought her a mood ring, and they begin recalling what each color meant when they looked it up. Finally Alma asks Elliot if he remembers which color stood for love, and he answers very honestly and tenderly, “I don’t remember.”  It echoes beautifully the estraingement between husband and wife and the distance that has grown between them. That scene has layers to it, and its probably only 2 minutes long and was a great subtle message within the overall message of the movie. It’s a shame that Shymalan appears to have been more focused on shock value with the death scenes and not on writing the usually well written and character driven films we’ve become usued to seeing in the past.


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (1)

Teeth (2007)

Reviewer's Rating: This entry has a rating of 4
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (2 votes, score: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 26 June 2008 by asmoul89

Teeth Movie PosterVagina dentata–Latin for toothed vagina. Does this not sound incredibly insane? Mitchell Lichtenstein directs this amazingly fresh piece of gore horror mixed with undertones of black comedy. The main character Dawn is flawlessly executed by Jess Weixler, and Dawn’s brother Brad is played by Nip/Tuck star John Hensley. Teeth takes place in your typical quaint neighborhood (which ironically offsets Dawn’s atypical condition), but Dawn’s life is anything but typical.

The movie begins with a panoramic view of the quiet neighborhood but don’t get too comfortable yet. Lichtenstein quickly delves into the obscene having Brad and Dawn play in a kiddie pool as children. Brad, being the distraught and eccentric child, exposes himself to his younger sister and then asks Dawn to expose herself. Brad is bitten on the finger after attempting to molest her. Teeth fastforwards to Dawn’s teenage years where promiscuous sex has become the epitome of teenage pop culture. Dawn, however, is waiting to devote herself to her knight in shining armor (after getting married, of course). This changes when she meets Tobey (played by Hale Appleman). Dawn attempts to brainwash herself with reoccurring thoughts of purity, but the hormonal temptation between the two teens is just too much. What starts out as innocent kissing quickly spirals out of control. Ultimately, Dawn becomes a target for male domination. Tobey’s dominance endeavor falls short after his penis is bitten in half…by Dawn’s vagina. Obviously Dawn is apalled with her vaginal “adaptation” and decides to research her particular ailment. This is the part where Dawn discovers she is living proof of a widespread cultural myth. Her vagina happens to possess teeth closely related to those of a shark (a scene with two doctors relays this bit of information), however, the crown/enamel is most similar to a human. Many more “accidents” occur as Dawn slowly slips from the world of the prudes into the world of the sexually active.

The tagline for this film is nothing short of genius. “Every rose has its thorns” perfectly captures the essence of Teeth with symbolic wit. When we think of roses we think of love, of innocence, of purity. This depicts Dawn’s character before she becomes a sex machine. The “thorn” could very well symbolize Dawn’s vaginal dentata condition, but it could also represent Dawn’s virtuous life spiraling out of control. The tagline in itself is enough to make you grab this DVD off the shelf and take a peek.

Now for my favorite part…the gore. Although you never catch a glimpse of the toothed vagina, there are plenty of severed bloody penises abound for the average gore whore to get their kicks. Will it make a guy queasy? Oh, most certainly, but that’s what’s so great about it! This movie is one parable every man should watch no matter how painful. The men Dawn engages with present a false facade only to morph into a man that fits the common male stereotype (that most men are jackasses). Little do they know Dawn is prepared for the ultimate revenge. The lesson of the film? Don’t mess with innocence…and don’t piss girls like Dawn off at all.

Teeth gives a fantastically fresh face to the horror genre and should instantly become a cult classic amongst the youth. Some may say the story drags a bit. Nevertheless, the film did not disappoint as I was entertained for the entire duration. I was extremely surprised this film did not receive a NC-17 rating, but nowadays a PG movie can slip a curse word or two. However, this film does push the envelope (that’s why I love it). See this smash hit and brag to your friends how you were able to sit through the entire thing.

***4/5 stars***


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Dark Floors (2008)

Reviewer's Rating: N/A
Rate This Movie: (Time Waster!)(It Sucks)(So... So...)(Watch This!)(Get the DVD!) (2 votes, score: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Posted on 20 June 2008 by asmoul89

Dark FloorsAfter the credits began to roll across the screen, I stared straight ahead, mouth agape. This was not the good type of gawking. I had wasted one hour and twenty minutes of my life I would never be able to get back.

Dark Floors is directed by Pete Riski. The movie was released in Finland just this year. Prior to seeing this film, I had NO idea it was a film featuring a popular Finnish metal band called Lordi. This band is known for its insanely ridiculous getup of monster costumes. When I say insanely ridiculous, I don’t mean scary…I mean fit for the circus ridiculous.

Sarah (played by Skye Bennett) is a mentally troubled little girl. Her unstable condition is hardly discussed save for a scene in which nurse Emily (played by Dominique McElligott) brings about the subject of epilepsy (a disorder causing seizures). One can assume from the girl’s actions she is autistic. Sarah is basically handicapped and must be in a wheelchair. In order to occupy her fragile mind, her father Ben (played by Noah Huntley) allows her to draw pictures. Before the dastardly villains appear, Sarah is shown drawing the monstrous figures on her paper. Ben becomes irritated with the treatment of his daughter and decides (against the wishes of Emily) to attempt to leave the hospital. Ben, Sarah, and Emily board an elevator with a rich snob, a security guard, a homeless man, and another unimportant character.

Anyway, the elevator becomes stuck between the 6th and 7th floors (a cheesy nursery rhyme like something out of Grimm’s Fairy Tales soon follows). Once the doors finally open the hospital appears completely deserted, and the elevator occupants are baffled. Cue the non-appalling creatures from another realm. Surprise! It just so happens the elevator occupants SOMEHOW became trapped in a parallel universe with these hellish beasts. Ultimately, this movie wound up collapsing under its own weight. How could a movie such as Dark Floors begin with such promise and give way to this horrific pile of steaming cow dung?

Obviously the band member’s costumes were used to portray (computer effects were used) the evil villains Dark Floors. The visual effects were sometimes appealing but were mostly monotonous and obtuse. I have no idea what Riski was thinking! These villains were the farthest thing from being utterly terrifying. The closest thing to scary was the apparition I like to call The Screeching Woman. The only purpose she served was making my ears bleed–she was more annoying than scary.

As you may already tell, I believe the plot is absolutely asinine. However, I will give credit for Riski’s horrific atmosphere. Although the creatures failed to produce any scares, the deserted hospital, the darkened hallways, and the eerie musical score created the perfect horror movie setting. If the creatures had been…you know…scary, the film would have been so much better.

After the scene with the old lady in the motorized wheelchair, please stop the movie and take it back or walk out of the theater. That is as good as Dark Floors gets–it’s all downhill from there. It is films such as this that deserve an extra special space upon the abandoned shelf. The sole purpose of this sorry excuse for a film should be to collect dust.

***Dark Floors: 1/5 stars.***


The above author's byline must be attached to the work if being distributed.

Comments (0)

Stay Updated

    Would you like to receive the latest movie review in your inbox? Simply put your name and email below to be on our announcement list!
    Name:
    Email:


Search Movie Review

    Enter a movie title (partial title OK), actor/actress, director, or anything else you are looking for in the box below:


Top Movie Critics (Past 30 Days)



CATEGORIES

RELATED SITES

INFORMATION

RSS Feed rss feed