The Experiment

Answering a classified ad in the newspaper, dozens of men line up, are tested and apply to win a spot in The Experiment. With pay of $1,000 per day and a two week experiment, it’s not difficult to figure out why these men decided to get into the program. Once they are selected, the 26 men are split into two groups. The prisoners, and the guards. There are simple, yet strict rules that each participant must follow through on in order for everyone to get paid. What results is humans at their most base level in a predictable and completely surface level film.

Adrian Brody stars as prisoner 77. He’s joined the experiment for the money and his hope to meet Maggie Grace in India when he’s finished. The entire love story between the two is silly and really not worth the little time it’s given. The problem 77 gets into is he doesn’t know how to keep his mouth shut. Once he’s in the prison he’s constantly complaining about not liking the food or the prisoners not being nice to certain people who lied to get into the experiment. He really does just need to shut up and go along with the experiment, that’s his job, that’s what he’s getting paid to do.

Forest Whitaker plays the man in charge, the prison guard Barris. Barris is unique from the majority of the group as he’s doing this because of his mother. He claims he is wanting to pay for her medical bills but it’s clearly shown that she treats him poorly and he’s doing this for a chance to get away and to become a man. Barris takes things too far which leads to the dissolution of order within this prison. Whitaker is solid in the performance, one that I saw a lot of Jon Kavanagh in this performance where he’s playing a man slightly off center.

The problem with the movie is first off there is nothing below the surface. The writer/director Paul Scheuring is not trying to say anything with this film. It’s not trying to be anything other than an exercise in showing what happens when men are around each other for too long. The next problem is what’s the point of the experiment? The people in charge are shown very briefly and I didn’t exactly get what the point of the movie or experiment was. For a company that’s giving out $14,000 to each man, they don’t seem to have much interest in discovering anything. Finally, I guess what’s really the point of the film? It’s not really showing the audience something it hasn’t seen about a million times before. You mean people that don’t know each other will be mean if there is money on the line and other people tell them to? Shocking. It’s a silly film with some decent actors in it but frankly it’s not worth your time.

Featured Comedy Movies

I’ts a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963)

 Greed is a trope used in the realm of fiction to be associated with drama, and usually involves some very thematic elements to it. Yet the theme really has not been associated with the genre of comedy. Enter the 1963 film “It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World”, a comedy that showcases a lot of […]

St. Vincent (2014)

 This movie opens up with our main character telling a very dry joke, which sets up the tone for the rest of the film. “St. Vincent” is a comedy that puts focus on one grumpy old man trying to come to terms with his life. The resulting effort is a gem of originality that has […]

Big Hero 6 (2014)

 Ever since Disney purchased Marvel back in 2009, we have gotten a lot of good action/superhero films that have a strong connection to their continuity. However, with today’s feature, Marvel and Disney are branching out and creating something completely different. The finalized product is the motion picture for today “Big Hero 6” based off Marvel’s […]


  1. dha8893 says:

    I completely disagree with your statement that this film was “not worth your time.” This film is a direct allusion towards the experiment held at Stanford University by Social Psychologist Phil Zimbardo. This movie simply takes this 1970s experiment and projects it to the audience today. Obviously, not everybody knows about this experiment and the results and implications of this experiment so the director, with the help of amazing actors, illustrated the cruelty and inhumane behavior of seemingly innocent and benevolent people. This movie emphasizes the raw effects of power, control, and dominance. Thus, this movie could have been a bit too deep our foreign for you, my friend, because obviously Paul Scheuring is saying a lot here.

  2. I’m well aware of the Stanford experiment. Like I said in the review, everything about this film was very surface level entertainment and completely obvious. There was no subtext in the film at all. I’m glad you got something out of the film, I just didn’t see it.

  3. Have you seen the German original? That film’s really good, rather tense and frightening in places. I almost don’t want to see this because I know it’ll just blot the original’s copybook

  4. I haven’t seen the original, but it’s on my queue. I’m hoping to enjoy it more than this film, as most originals are typically better than the American remake.

Speak Your Mind