Categorized | Action, Comedy, Drama, Sci-Fi

Film Review: Thor (2011)

The final pieces of Marvel’s master plan are falling into place. Developing their key characters one film at a time and sowing the seeds of hype with post-credit teases, Marvel have prepared for ‘The Avengers’ with military precision. Next up is Thor – lesser known, but no less entertaining.

Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is a prince of the mystical realm of Asgard. He is vain and impetuous, and his actions cause King Odin (Anthony Hopkins) to banish him to Earth to learn the meaning of humility. His jealous brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston), next in line to the throne, starts causing trouble in Asgard, and Thor must find a way back before it is too late.

This was always going to be the tricky one. The protagonist is a god, and his story split between Earth and a supernatural realm. ‘Thor’ avoids the ‘Clash Of The Titans’approach of making everything out of light and clouds, instead taking the graphic novels at face value, recreating the source material in all its straight-faced silliness.

There are impractically tall gleaming golden towers, portals to different realms and a bridge made out of rainbows – Asgard may not be realistic but it is beautifully realised. Add to this the warriors of different powers, all clad in armour and capes – and you have more than enough camp epic-ness to rival ‘The Lord Of The Rings’.

Despite all its pomp, ‘Thor’ doesn’t really feel like a traditional superhero film. There is no discovery process, no trial and error montage. Most of the time Thor doesn’t even have powers. The point of his character is that he is the opposite of the traditional superhero. Thor begins with god-status, but he must learn what it is to be a man. 

‘Thor’ is a Shakespearean tale at heart, with themes of power struggle, sibling rivalry and lessons in morality – making Kenneth Branagh an appropriate choice for director. He tells a very human story about gods, striking a balance between the film’s two settings: epic melodrama for the lords of Asgard and endearing naivety for the mortals of Earth.

Thor’s adjustment to life on Earth presents huge potential for comedy. Infrequent slapstick is used to great effect, but the main highlight is the fish-out-of-water humour, which is hilarious. Handled with restraint, the comedy is never embarrassing. It is perfect way to frame Thor’s development, which is where the film shines.

Chris Hemsworth makes a fantastic Thor. He starts off with a confident swagger, a booming voice, and a cocky smile that shows he’s in control. As the movie progresses and he finds humility, he tones it down appropriately. Hemsworth’s performance is natural and convincing, genuinely coming across as an arrogant god learning a lesson.

The film’s strength in character is let down by the action. There’s not enough of it, Thor’s hammer is underused, and the set pieces are less epic than you would expect from a god of thunder. There are instances of jaw-dropping spectacle, but the rest is forgettable, poorly shot and poorly edited.

The editing doesn’t just dampen a couple of scenes. Too much has been taken out of the film, which makes the development seem somewhat rushed. Some relationships feel a little forced, like the budding romance between Thor and Natalie Portman’s character. It feels like when you skip a chapter on a DVD – not disastrous but not complete.

Overall, ‘Thor’ is everything a comic book movie should be. It is balanced between its fidelity to source material and its accessibility to newcomers, between over-the-top seriousness and light-hearted fun. This is a good film, although an extended cut would make it great.

About ced.yuen

I'm a freelance multimedia journalist working in print, online, and video. I'm also a bit of a film nut, so I write about them a lot. If I get paid for my words, great. But otherwise, I do it just because I'm passionate about it.

4 Responses to “Film Review: Thor (2011)”

  1. Matthew Kane says:

    Very well-written review. This was a pleasure to read, keep ‘em comin’.

    Just one question: one of my larger with “Iron Man 2″ was the overwhelming presence of “The Avengers” in the future. I thought “Iron Man” and “The Incredible Hulk” both handled the Marvel Universe crossovers well enough, but in “IM2,” the Avengers storyline wasn’t very well-developed, it just laid there. How did it work in “Thor”? Was it obnoxious? Or did they do it right again?

  2. ced.yuen says:

    It is certainly more ‘Iron Man’ than ‘Iron Man 2′. S.H.I.E.L.D. *are* in the film, and if you look closely enough there are things there to set up The Avengers, but their inclusion is much more subtle and natural so it doesn’t ever stick out as a set-up.

    This is very much a film about Thor, rather than an Avengers prequel that has Thor in it. They did it right again.

    Hope that helps!

  3. Matthew Kane says:

    It does! I’ll be seeing it sometime this weekend.

  4. danny2085 says:

    Pretty well written and easy to read, good job! I just finished watching it and was impressed with Thor. I particularly liked Chris Hemsworth’s performance, I have only ever seen him in Star Trek but his charisma is robust enough to be a convincing and engaging lead.

    I liked Loki and the relationship between him and Odin and him and Thor was pretty well-layered. The thing I liked about Loki is that here in this movie he has a reason as to why he is the film’s antagonist. Most comic book movies have a cookie-cutter villain with no real motive, here it’s quite clear-he is jealous and feels betrayed by his own family.

    Unfortunately, I saw it in 3-D and found it easier to take off the glasses, but then I had to put them on when I couldn’t see certain scenes.

    Marvel has hit another homerun, I would rank this above Iron Man 2 and The Incredible Hulk but below Iron Man 1. As a DC Comics fan, I can only hope that they are taking notes with how Marvel approaches their characters and how well they translate onto the screen. Come June, Green Lantern has a tough act to follow.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe to MFR

Archives